Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences
Login
NJES
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Latest Issue
    • All Issues
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submission Resources
    • Authorship
    • Article Processing Charges (APC)
  • Reviewers
    • Guide for Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
  • Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Plagiarism
    • Allegations of Misconduct
    • Appeals and Complaints
    • Corrections and Withdrawals
    • Open Access
    • Archiving Policy
    • Copyright Policy
  • About
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Journal Insights
    • Peer Review Process
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Announcements
    • Contact

Search Results for chest-x-rays

Article
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Pneumonia Detection

Elaf Ayyed Jebur

Pages: 639-652

PDF Full Text
Abstract

This study evaluates the performance and efficiency of four deep learning models—VGG-16, ResNet-50, Inception-V3, and DenseNet-121—in detecting pneumonia from chest X-rays, addressing the critical need for balanced accuracy and computational efficiency in clinical diagnostics. Methods: A dataset of 5,234 chest X-rays (3,875 pneumonia, 1,341 normal) was augmented via rotation, flipping, and zooming to mitigate class imbalance. Models were trained on an RTX 2060 GPU for 40 epochs, with performance assessed using accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and computational metrics (training time, memory usage). Statistical significance was validated via paired t-tests (p < 0.05). Results: DenseNet-121 achieved the highest accuracy (95.2% ± 0.8), F1 score (95.1% ± 0.7), and throughput (400 images/sec) with minimal memory usage (33MB). ResNet-50 and Inception-V3 showed moderate performance, while VGG-16 exhibited overfitting tendencies. In conclusion, DenseNet-121 showed strong performance compared to other models, both in terms of accuracy and processing speed, which is essential for use in real-time clinical settings. However, the small size of the validation set and limited population diversity are important limitations that should be addressed in future studies. Moreover, more testing on larger datasets is needed to confirm the stability of the model and see how the model will work in different settings. Future work should address ethical considerations in AI-driven diagnostics and validate findings across multi-institutional datasets.

1 - 1 of 1 items

Search Parameters

×

The submission system is temporarily under maintenance. Please send your manuscripts to

Go to Editorial Manager
Journal Logo
Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences (NJES)

College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University

  • Copyright Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Cookie Settings
Licensing & Open Access

CC BY NC 4.0 Logo Licensed under CC-BY-NC-4.0

This journal provides immediate open access to its content.

Editorial Manager Logo Elsevier Logo

Peer-review powered by Elsevier’s Editorial Manager®

Copyright © 2026 College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, its licensors, and contributors. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.